jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
6th May 2008

Reverends in the closet

posted in National issues |

If you didn’t know, I support Hillary Clinton for president. Yet, in the final stretch, I am truly in the “anyone but McCain” camp and would easily switch to Obama if he were the Democratic nominee. During this campaign, as with most presidential campaigns in my lifetime, the top candidates all disappoint me at some level. I have always hated McCain’s hawk-like approach to international relations and disagreed with his position on a woman’s right to choose, but I used to think he had integrity at least—until he changed his position on waterboarding and began trolling far right for votes. Clinton has also let me down at times; most recently, her plan to take a holiday from the 18-cent federal tax on gas, as if that solved the unholy government-oil industry partnership that enables companies to gorge on gluttonous profits at the expense of people and the environment. For his part, Obama has had moments where he has been a refreshing, candid voice on the campaign trail, but he too has slipped into the same-old mold of attack, counter attack, and rhetorical pandering. It seems they will all do whatever it takes to get elected. Perhaps it’s not possible to hold high standards, be true to your convictions, and get yourself elected president of the United States. Even when you’re trying to do the right thing, maybe especially so, it’s not easy to be popular and raise big bucks. That said, I was pleased to read in yesterday’s Globe that recent polls suggest many Americans don’t hold Obama at fault for the words of his former minister. When the hate-filled sermons first filled the airwaves and Obama stood by Reverend Wright, he was showing loyalty to a man and a relationship that spanned decades.  (I’m ok with loyalty.) Later, when the reverend went public to reiterate his hateful views more clearly (with friends like this who needs enemies), Obama denounced him, and I’m okay with that too. At the end of the day, we vote for who we believe will fight for our values, lead our country with wisdom, and collaborate to get the job done—because in a democracy, leadership is very much a collaborative effort. And as far as I can remember, our choice for president has always been limited to a few, less-than-great candidates. But maybe that’s more an indictment of the process than the candidates themselves…

There are currently 3 responses to “Reverends in the closet”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On May 7th, 2008, anonymous said:

    I think that Obama responded when he was being swift-boated – he had to, as he saw 4 years ago what happens when you don’t. But I disagree that he has tried to attack Hillary for anything other than her policies. I was a devoted fan of Hillary Clinton until she turned into a hawk. For how many years did she go on talk shows defending the war and the Bush policies surrounding the war? That’s when I became disillusioned, and that was years before she ran for President. It wasn’t because she voted for the war, but because she defended it up until she saw the tide turning against the war. Now, she is spinning an alternate reality about how to win the nomination. She agreed not to seat Michigan and Florida, and now that she sees that seating them would be in her favor, she wants to change the rules that she agreed to. Isn’t that the kind of leadership we’ve had for the last 8 years? Starting yesterday, her campaign is trying to spin a new delegate count needed to win. Aren’t you sick of our leaders spinning the truth so it is to their advantage? Certainly, Obama isn’t perfect. But so far, I have not seen him spinning away the truth. At this point, she cannot win pledged delegates or the popular vote, if going by the rules she agreed to in the beginning. It is more and more unlikely she can win the superdelegates. She is damaging the democratic candidate by staying in the race. What is the point and who benefits from this?

  2. 2 On May 7th, 2008, Jackie said:

    I agree with you that Hillary has been disappointing in those areas you mention as well as others, but I don’t feel the prolonged decision on a nominee has been a bad thing for Democrats–more and more are getting involved and voting, especially in those swing states; as long as those people vote in the general election as well, whoever the nominee is…

  3. 3 On May 7th, 2008, Lynne said:

    It wasn’t a bad thing (except for the useless, painful, unfair attacks, which yes, was mostly Clinton, not Obama, slinging the mud – and I’m only a lukewarm Obama supporter, never married to him but I do like a lot of what I see, and I can’t stand Clinton for all the reasons listed…).

    Now, however, it’s time to end this charade. It’s gone on so long, the uncertainty, that McCain’s poll numbers against both candidates are too high for my comfort. We need to get on track showcasing Mr. Flipper and his Amazing Changing Values, and his constant support of the W. The sooner, the better.

    I’d like a landslide in November, it’s the only way to completely repudiate the last horrible 8 years. That can’t happen if we’re squabbling all the way up to August. Ye gods…

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media