jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
2nd April 2008

Kozol comes to Lowell

posted in Books, Education |

As a student at UML, in a Sociology class, Chancellor Marty Meehan read a book called Death at an Early Age, by Jonathan Kozol.  It changed the way he thought about education and equality.  Today, Meehan introduced Jonathan Kozol to a packed room at the Leary library.  Present were faculty, students, teachers, members of the school department, and interested community members. Current Lowell Superintendent Karla Baehr was in the audience along with future superintendent Chris Augusta Scott. Dana Mohler-Faria, president of Bridgewater State College and special advisor for education to Governor Patrick, sat on the panel of respondents and told the crowd he feels a ”sense of urgency” about our children and that education is the governor’s number one priority.

Kozol is a brave and compassionate man who has spent his career saying uncomfortable things about poverty, race and class.  Today’s lecture was entitled “Public Education Under Siege:  The Challenges for Educators in our Nation’s Separate and Unequal Schools.”  He sees the challenges that face urban teachers stemming from too little resources and too much testing, testing that is relentless because of the sword of AYP that hangs over the heads of principals and districts.  He is outraged that a poverty-stricken district, whose children may never have had the advantage of 2 or 3 years of quality pre-school (the norm in wealthy and even middle-class families), will be punished and have their funding decreased when these children fail a test in the third grade.  Studies have shown that early childhood education is the greatest predictor we have of student success, and many of the neediest children never get it or don’t get enough.  (This is a sore point with us in Lowell, since pre-school transportation was cut in 2003 and never restored.) Thus, the pressure is on idealistic, impassioned young teachers to become “drill sargents for the state,” and the pressure is on urban districts to squeeze out creativity, enrichment, even recess, to avoid the harsh penalties of the No Child Left Behind Act. As he points out, no one is opposed to useful, diagnostic testing that can give valuable and timely feedback to educators about a child’s needs and strengths. His thoughts on NCLB:  “It can’t be fixed; it needs to be rejected.”

But Kozol isn’t all gloom and doom. He complimented Lowell on being in certain ways “a wonderful exception, partly because of demographics and partly because of leadership.”   He deeply reveres the profession of teaching and the mystical chemistry that can occur between teacher and child that can result in a magical learning environment (something that is totally absent from the rigid formulations of NCLB).  He visited a Boston first-grade classroom over a school year in the course of writing his latest book, Letters to a Young Teacher, and his descriptions of his visits were vivid, delightful and heartwarming. For more information about this impassioned crusador for children, his writings, and his causes, you can visit Education Action! 

There are currently 4 responses to “Kozol comes to Lowell”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On April 3rd, 2008, Jonathan Kozol « No Teacher Left Standing said:

    [...] April 3, 2008 I serendipitously was given an opportunity to hear Dr. Kozol at the Biggy Lecture at UML yesterday afternoon.   This was the second time I’ve heard Dr. Kozol speak — each time it’s been thought-provoking. [...]

  2. 2 On April 3rd, 2008, Papa Smurf said:

    Too little resources??

    What’s the per pupil spending i Lowell again?

  3. 3 On April 3rd, 2008, Margaret said:

    Lowell spends $11,660 per pupil which is a little over the state average of $11,210. We have Ed Reform to thank for this, but as Dr. Baehr pointed out on the radio last week, to really equalize opportunity (and MCAS scores), you need to spend more money on students who come to school with critical disadvantages – limited English, poverty, transience, lack of crucial early childhood education, etc. There has been and is no question now of doing this. For the last 5 years, it has been enough to prevent cuts in direct services to children (teachers), to protect the smaller class sizes that had been achieved and to preserve critical programs.

  4. 4 On April 4th, 2008, Jackie said:

    One problem with funding is that costs keep rising (as we have all seen at the gas tank, the grocery store, and home utilities) and the revenues have not kept pace. The Lowell schools are looking at a $3-4 million shortfall for next year’s budget. Salary increases of 2.5% will cost about $2.5 million more next year, while health insurance (about $15 million out of last year’s budget) is expected to go up between 10-12%, yet the schools predict an increase of only $1 million in state funding while the city (the schools other major funding source) will probably get less from the state than last year, placing an unfair burden on property owners. The federal government, despite all its mandates under No Children Left Behind, provides less than one percent of its budget toward public education. The current system in Mass. of funding education on property taxes is inadequate.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media