jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
21st March 2008

Must we always get along?

posted in Education, In the News, Local Politics |

Please note: this is Margaret writing 

Yesterday while strolling down Middle Street, I saw a bumper sticker that read “Democracy needs Dissent.” In light of some of the dissension on the school committee these days and repeated calls for everyone to get along, I think we should heed these words. Sure, it is nice to present a united front, to have everyone agree and get along; however, I think putting harmony first, relegating the inevitable disagreements to the backroom, does a disservice to voters. Without public discussion, handled in an orderly fashion according to Robert’s Rules, how will the voters ever clearly see what a candidate stands for, what philosophy drives them and what they are willing to fight for? As an informed voter, I want to see our elected officials stand up for their beliefs and argue for them in an open forum. Yes, it can get messy, it can be stressful, but that’s what democracy is all about. In the past, I felt that there was a reluctance to stand up to city hall, the local media, or even question the delegation; it seemed concerned parents had no one to speak their case, so we had to speak up ourselves. Maybe our new superintendent will have an uphill battle at first, but if people pay attention and see who exactly is blocking progress, they can speak up at meetings, contact the committee, and organize other like-minded people to do the same. It’s not easy, it’s not comfortable, but that’s what it takes.

There are currently 2 responses to “Must we always get along?”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On March 21st, 2008, Jackie said:

    Believe me, I don’t enjoy conflict. As much as I recognize that harmony sits easier and consensus (at least a majority consensus) is the only way to accomplish anything, we are not a football team that must sacrifice all individuality for the win. We are a political body, elected to oversee the education of our children; as such, it is my duty to speak, vote, and fight for what I believe is in the best interests of those children even when it’s uncomfortable and yes, perhaps divisive.

  2. 2 On March 21st, 2008, Jackie said:

    Another thing: I TOTALLY DISAGREE with today’s editorial that “A new superintendent should not have to do constant battle with a divided committee, which is what departing Supt. Karla Brooks Baehr has faced.” Dr. Baehr did not do battle with a divided committee, she had to endure numerous attacks from CERTAIN factions, including the very newspaper that is calling for unity today! The votes may not have all been unanimous, but her initiatives were supported, which is why the schools made the significant progress they did–although you didn’t read much about that progress in The Sun. As we go forward with voting on the next superintendent (heck I’d love a “clear majority” too), perhaps the paper can back off from its attacks and unbalanced reporting, and give the new superintendent the benefit of local media that actually supports progress in our schools.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media