jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
5th December 2007

Search for new supt. on hold

posted in Education, In the News |

Despite efforts by the mayor, a majority of the school committee, and several speakers from the community, the search for a new superintendent for the Lowell Public Schools was put on hold tonight due to a parliamentary move by school committee member Regina Faticanti. After hearing from speakers representing the Citywide Parent Council and Stand for Children, all of whom advocated for immediate action and parental input in the search process,  as well as much discussion between members, the committee voted 6-1 to support Mayor Bill Martin’s motion to move forward with the search to find a replacement for Supt . Karla Brooks Baehr. Dr. Baehr told the committee in late November that she would not seek renewal of her contract, which expires in June 2008. The mayor’s motion called for the committee to meet over the next few weeks to recommend a timeline for advertising the position, a list of criteria for applicants, and suggestions for ways to include community input in the search to replace the controversial superintendent who, in seven years, led an overhaul in curriculum and instruction that resulted in significant progress in student learning. After Faticanti voted against the motion, she changed her vote and moved that the matter be tabled for reconsideration until the next meeting. Under Roberts Rules of Order, by which the committee abides, Faticanti was able to stall any search actions until the committee’s next meeting on Dec. 19, which will be its last for this term. The new committee will not meet until Jan. 9, 2008. By delaying search efforts for another month and potentially losing qualified candidates in the process, it’s difficult to see how this maneuver will benefit Lowell children or the district’s efforts to replace Dr. Baehr with the best qualified candidate. Instead, the move appears to be politically motivated to safeguard the complete authority of the incoming committee. Other matters were also discussed at the meeting—more on that later.

There are currently 5 responses to “Search for new supt. on hold”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On December 6th, 2007, Lowell Guy said:

    Tell me again why people keep electing Regina Faticanti?

  2. 2 On December 6th, 2007, Anonymous said:

    Just to clarify, the school committee voted to amend the mayor’s motion. It was not the orginial motion.

  3. 3 On December 6th, 2007, Jackie said:

    That’s true. The original motion was for the “Personnel Subcommittee” to meet on the issue and it was amended to the “committee as a whole,” which is a minor change really since often we all meet under the auspices of Personnel Subcommitte regarding issues such as superintendent evaluation, priority goals etc.

  4. 4 On December 6th, 2007, Jim Leary said:

    Actually, the acknowledgment and intent of the approved motion allowed the new committee to select both
    type of process followed and the new supt. The December 19th meeting would have and still will address
    the timeline for selecting the supt, the salary range and qualifications for the advertising posting
    and the actual advertisment for the position of the Lowell School’s Superintendent. In January when
    the new committee is in, they will create the actual process that will lead to hiring our new
    supt. within the predetermined timelines. Thus, the change is really a significant compromise by
    both opinins in an effort to complete the most in important task we have – hiring our new Superintendent.

  5. 5 On December 7th, 2007, Jackson said:

    Thanks Jim, a voice of reason.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media