jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
3rd April 2007

Governor visits to give $$$ for nanotechnology, but one question goes unasked

posted in Education, In the News, Local Politics |

Governor Deval Patrick was in Lowell today to deliver the first $4 million in state funds for the new Nanotech Center at UML. As the photo to the left depicts, State Senator Steve Panagiatakos made welcoming remarks before Governor Patrick spoke. To Patrick’s left is Dana Mohler-Faria, his special advisor for education, and to his right is UML Interim Chancellor David MacKenzie. State Rep Kevin Murphy, chair of the Higher Education Committee, is shown in the far right photo.

                                                   

 

 It was inspiring to hear the speeches about what a great opportunity the nanotechnology center will offer not only Lowell, UML, and the Merrimac Valley, but how it could very well be the catalyst of as Governor Patrick put it “one piece in an overall plan” to bring robust economic development to the state with far-reaching impact within the global marketplace. Why not have Massachusetts–specifically UMass Lowell–be the world center for nanotechnology research and product development? As inspiring as those words are for those of us who call this place home, I couldn’t help but think about our K-12 students and how we have had to downsize our science programs since 2003. We no longer have science teachers for our elementary students, who now receive science instruction from classroom teachers with little time to prepare experiments or do hands-on science work. At the middle school level, science has suffered time crunching to make way for more math and reading instruction. At the high school, a poorly equipped, limited number of science labs result in only a small percentage of students getting exposure to science experiments, and even for those students, it is in inadequate increments.

So, of course, when Governor Patrick asked if there were any questions from the audience, I wanted to ask. (I didn’t but I wish I had, and next time I will.) I should have asked because for me it was the elephant in the room that needed to be addressed: How will Lowell public school children have access to nanotechnology studies and the opportunities UML will offer if our science education is inadequate to prepare them to meet the challenges? What is the governor’s or the legislators’ plan to make sure our kids get the quality science preparation they deserve and that is required in the world we live in today? Just adding a science component to MCAS, which is all I’ve seen so far, won’t cut it.

There are currently 5 responses to “Governor visits to give $$$ for nanotechnology, but one question goes unasked”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On April 5th, 2007, Anonymous said:

    In reference to the unfortunate K-12 students in public school whose science programs have been cut since 2003, maybe you should take a lesson from the parochial schools in Lowell who manage to educate for much less money than the $8000.00/student that the public schools get.

  2. 2 On April 5th, 2007, JOE BISHOP said:

    Here’s another question for you: why is this even being funded? This is a waste of taxpayer money.

  3. 3 On April 6th, 2007, Jackie said:

    Parochial school students do not have to pass MCAS, nor do they receive the extent of services many of our students (especially special education students) need. Currently, about 15% of our students receive special education services—such as one-on-one paraprofessionals and out-of-district programs—some of which are very expensive. Parochial schools also do not have the staffing compensation programs public schools are required to provide, and the demographics regarding poverty levels and non-English speakers are quite different. The two are not on the same playing field in terms of required services and costs for those services. Thanks for your comment!

  4. 4 On April 6th, 2007, Jackie said:

    Joe, I have to disagree with you. The investment in nanotechnology is an economic one that should reap great benefits in terms of jobs, enhanced research programs for UML and its students, as well as cutting-edge products in collaboration with industry. I am loosely quoting Senator Panagiotakos here because I agree with him: “Our greatest asset in Massachusetts is the knowledge and work ethic of our people—nanotechnology will enable us to build a future on those strengths.” I just want to make sure our urban public school kids get the skills and experience they need to take advantage of those opportunities. Thanks for your comment!

  5. 5 On April 7th, 2007, JOE BISHOP said:

    Yes, let the private sector decide. Don’t milk taxpayers to create what is an unneeded nanotechnology center.

    It is alarming to me what liberals believe the state should fun. The more you rely on the state, the less freedom you have.

    By the way our greatest asset is definitely NOT the government: local, state, or federal.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media