jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
11th September 2007

Report sheds light on school hiring

posted in Education, Local Politics |

As promised in an earlier post (see Who Wants to be a Principal?), we have the facts on school hiring practices.  Check out Jackie’s Op-Ed on this subject in today’s Sun (or read it here) which opens as follows: 

Finally, we can put to rest the unfounded accusations that the Lowell School District does not promote from within or hire residents for key jobs in our schools. At last week’s school committee meeting, the superintendent presented a “Personnel Report on Hiring Practices” that showed 66% of all those hired for administrative positions over the last seven years have been promoted from within, 33% of the new hires live in Lowell, and 38% were raised here. 

I never understood why geography should be more important than a person’s qualifications, especially when it comes to educating our children.  If all things are equal, then yes, to hire locally or from within is preferred; however, the rumors we’ve been hearing seemed to suggest that a person from Lowell is not only not preferred, but actually given less consideration than an outsider.  I think the report shows how false these rumors are.   

There are currently 5 responses to “Report sheds light on school hiring”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On September 11th, 2007, Jo said:

    I understand concerns regarding the promoting from within practice–when the best candidate is within, that makes sense. However, I do not understand the hullabaloo about initially hiring only from Lowell candidates. Sure, it’s a bonus to have a local who is probably more invested in her community, but does it make a teacher an excellent teacher because she lives nearby? I don’t think so. The people who do the hiring should only be concerned with how well a teacher or an administrator does his/her job, not how long his/her commute is. If this was the practice of big business or other educational institutions like UMass/Lowell, MCC or even the distant NECC in Haverhill, how many of us would NOT have been hired because we didn’t live in the same city as the job?

  2. 2 On September 12th, 2007, Jackie said:

    I agree. When I think of some of the jobs I’ve had in the past, such as working at Emerson College in Boston, Raytheon in Bedford, and Daniel Webster College in Nashua, I know I gave them all my best effort even though I didn’t live in those communities. How fair would it have been if I was excluded from those positions because of geography?

  3. 3 On September 12th, 2007, anonymous said:

    I am very disappointed in your article in the paper. It is always a shame when a politician resorts to underhanded methods in order to further their own popularity. Shame on you.

  4. 4 On September 12th, 2007, Jackie said:

    I don’t understand what is “underhanded” or “shameful” about responding to accusations (that were published in the newspaper) with FACTS. I initially requested the report from the superintendent to discover if there was any merit to the charges. The report showed a 66% promotion rate, which proved the accusations were misleading. It was presented to the school committee on Sept. 5, yet received NO COVERAGE from the newspaper–that is, until yeserday when my article was published. My job is to do what’s best for the education of our children. To me, that includes setting the record straight about what’s going on in our schools. I am proud of my willingness and ability to speak out on important issues impacting our schools.

  5. 5 On September 12th, 2007, Michelle said:

    Hey anonymous,

    SHAME ON YOU!!! You must be one of the RUMOR MONGERS!!!

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media