jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
11th August 2007

One week left to see Hopper at the MFA

posted in Art |

If you can get down to Boston this week, treat yourself to the Hopper exhibit at the MFA, which ends August 19th. It’s well worth the $23, and if you plan ahead you may be able to save some money by borrowing a pass from the Pollard Memorial Library.

What is it about Edward Hopper? His paintings seem fairly ordinary:  the side of a house, a row of brick buildings in the early morning light, two people staring out at the sea or sitting at a diner counter late at night. For me it became clear when I was looking at one of his early watercolors, ‘Prospect Street’– a perfectly fine painting of a street, a row of houses, a tree or two. Then, right next to it, the same painting redone in oils and renamed ‘Sun on Prospect Street’. Suddenly, the light on the side of a white house is incandescent; the tree at the end of the street takes on a new significance, the contrast of sun and shadow seems ominous, yet thrilling.  Then there is the blue he uses; that ’Hopper blue’.  In ‘A Room in Brooklyn’, one sees the blue rectangles of sky through long windows with green shades, that certain type of old-fashioned green shade that fits the room.  The room is austere, composed, airless – the blue of the sky is heartbreaking.  The same with ‘The Sea Watchers’, depicting a couple in bathing suits, side-by-side, but not looking, never looking, at one another, just staring out to sea.  The view is from the side, and beyond is that pitiless rectangle of blue sky.   

There are close to 100 paintings in the show, including the famous ‘Nighthawks’, and they span his whole career from early watercolors to his final, poignant work, ‘Sunlight in an Empty Room.’  At the beginning of the show there is a quote by the artist that sums it up, “All I wanted to do was to paint the sunlight on the side of a house.” 

There are currently 3 responses to “One week left to see Hopper at the MFA”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On August 11th, 2007, massmarrier said:

    I concur, it was an amazing and exhausting show. There are a number of yawners at the MFA and elsewhere, but this one is worth a trip.

    [Unnecessary cavil. The crowds can be distracting as at any special art show. The bozos with the guided-tour headphones are like suburbanites at the mall talking into cell phones as they walk into each other. Scope each room, so that you avoid the herd and can focus on each piece that captures you. The sheep move along as the tape advances, giving you space to enjoy.]

    You can get burned out quickly on the Cape Cod art. Don’t fret. He’s strongest on people and Manhattan, and secondarily on Gloucester. Also, make sure to revel in the sketchbooks in a display case in the next to last room.

    I used to work at MOMA and spent some time with Hopper’s work. I’m not an art critic, but I disagree with the current trend to describing his people as alienated and isolated. For one, the folk I saw this show with and I disagreed with the description of the Truro bathers you cite. They were at a beach where artists and others go to relax and are “off”. She also had her bathing cap on. She was headed back in and was resting. We did not feel the “alone together” motif that is popular for Hopper’s work now.

    There are other paintings and sketches (the two men in In a Restaurant in deep conversation for one and the couple in New York Restaurant that is in the show) that reveal a spectrum. His work often exhibits a big-city sangfroid that can befuddle the Hallmark crowd.

    I’d almost recommend ignoring the people art the first time, hitting the landscapes and architecture. If you are not in sensory overload by then, returning to the beginning just to contemplate the people in his art is even more fascinating.

    It’s a fine show.

  2. 2 On August 12th, 2007, Margaret said:

    Thanks for your insightful comments! You may be right about the alienation/isolation being just a red herring, a way to avoid the complexity of his work. What gives me a shiver is the contrast between the angles and rectangles of his paintings and the blues and lemon yellows. There is a subtext there, but it may resist easy explanations. I’m not art critic either, but I had a physical reaction to many of the paintings. (Your right about the headphones, though I sometimes enjoy an audioguide myself).

  3. 3 On August 15th, 2007, massmarrier said:

    I concur. This was a very demanding show and I loved that.

    Some (Monet 8 or 9 years ago comes to mind) left people content. Hopper left those I was with and me — and from eavesdropping, others — in sensory overload. The range of exhibit was huge and the work intense.

    Thanks again for drawing this to your readers’ attention. They still have a few days.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media