jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
28th July 2007

Tierney & social security

posted in Local Politics |

As I said in a previous post, I saw a lot of Tom Tierney signs in North Chelmsford the other day.  On one side of Tierney’s signs you see the candidate’s name, but on the other it says “Tom Tierney will save Social Security.”  This statement seems disingenuous since it implies that he thinks there is something badly wrong with the program and that we need him to step in and save it.  Having heard him at the NPA debate last week, I understand that he believes that there is nothing wrong with Social Security and that it is one of the most successful programs ever, so the people he is saving it from are actually his fellow Republicans.  As President Bush was unable to get anywhere with his attacks on the program (one of his big campaign issues in ‘03), it seems to me as if Tierney is beating a dead horse; surely there are other issues he might want to emphasize?  Or, is he trying to have it both ways, attract those who think the program is in trouble as well as those who think it should be left alone? These were my thoughts as I sat in construction traffic looking at the numerous Tom Tierney signs.

There are currently 2 responses to “Tierney & social security”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On July 31st, 2007, Anonymous said:

    are you stating that there’s nothing wrong with social security?

    is that what you are saying?

    you must be the only person alive who doesn’t know about the numerous problems with social security.

    do you even subscribe to any newspapers at all?

  2. 2 On July 31st, 2007, Margaret said:

    Well, first of all I was relaying what Tom Tierney said about social security. However, when President Bush made this one of his campaign issues, I did read up on it and despite the gloom and doom threats about the failure of the program that I have heard for the last 30 years, it appears that as Tierney said, it is one of our most successful programs. In fact,I found this on the Economic Policy Institute (http://www.epinet.org/content.cfm/issueguide_socialsecurity) website: “estimates by the Social Security trustees (using rather pessimistic assumptions) and the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) indicate that the trust fund is solvent for another 38 to 48 years if we do nothing. In other words, Social Security is not going broke anytime soon.” In case that website is too partisan for you, I checked their facts on the social security website which issues annual reports on the programs financial status. Having had a elderly widow as a relative who was able to live on her social security payments, who had no other retirement savings, I can see the value of this kind of social safety net. And finally, I do read newspapers (The Boston Globe, The Lowell Sun and the New York Times) and magazines (The New Yorker and The Economist among others). Most of my sources felt that meddling with social security was irresponsible and unnecessary.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media