jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
17th July 2007

Can we afford our schools?

posted in Education, Money Matters |

I’ve been thinking of this for weeks, ever since we squeaked through the last budget session and had to be grateful that we “only” had to cut $800,000 instead of $1.6 million from the school department budget.  Listening to UML Sunrise this morning, I heard Bill Taupier, local businessman and political guru as well as a former school committee member and city manager, sounding critical of the school committee for accepting this compromise.  Taupier stated that basically the city has “short-changed the schools for the last 12 years” by not meeting its funding obligations.  He believes that if we lose our schools, we lose our city.  I agree with his emphasis on the importance of our public schools and the ongoing lack of local funding, but as a taxpayer and resident of the city who watched the Manager’s budget presentation, I felt that the city did the best it could this year.  After all, they need to clean up what seems to be years of irresponsible and inaccurate budgeting.  Still, I wonder; was I taken in by what seemed to be a fair and honest approach on the part of city hall?  Was I so grateful for the transparency that I was willing to cave in on what the schools needed? A fter the devasting cuts of 2003, when we got nothing for our pains, it felt good to at least achieve a compromise.  I guess time will tell; but for now, the question remains, can we afford to fund our schools, or even more importantly, can we afford not to?

There are currently 2 responses to “Can we afford our schools?”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On July 17th, 2007, Concerned citizen said:

    History has shown it does not matter how much money public schools get, the education will not change. It is not the money, it’s the system. How do Parochial schools educate for a fraction of the cost? The only compromise you made was not with the budget but with the failure to do a bottom up review to truly identify what ails our schools. Thinking that the number of dollars is the answer is like thinking that a bandaid will cure a severed artery. Again I implore you to use the parochial school as a model. Please don’t reply that the union or unfunded mandates are at fault because our children are truly being left behind.

  2. 2 On July 18th, 2007, Jackie said:

    I don’t agree with you that money doesn’t matter and “the education will not change”; I have seen the progress we’re making in the Lowell Public Schools firsthand. It’s not where it should be yet and the progress is not as quick as I’d like, but we’re doing a better job of educating our children–many of whom are from diverse ethnic, language, and economic backgrounds–which has a huge impact on support for those students outside of school. I also question your assumption that parochial schools are doing it so much better…which schools, in what way, and what evidence proves it (particularly with the most challenged students)? What do you see as the parochial model that differs so greatly from the public school approach? (I am always looking for ways to improve our educational system and am open to suggestions to help us do that.) Thank you for your comment.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media