jackiedoherty.org

News, schools, and views from a uniquely Lowell perspective
2nd June 2007

Is kindergarten the new first grade?

posted in Education, Money Matters |

I discovered the most amazing thing in kindergarten yesterday: Kids this age now read and write books. I went to the Bailey Elementary School for a literacy event and discovered young children reading their own stories. My children and I started our education in Lowell at the Bailey School 10 years ago, and even though my two are good students, they couldn’t read in kindergarten, nor could most of their friends. In fact, I don’t think I learned to read until first grade myself, and I’ve always been an excellent reader. And yet, yesterday, kindergarten students at the Bailey School read to me! (Apparently kindergarten is the new first grade.) 

In today’s world of high-stakes testing and full-day (at least in Lowell) kindergarten, children learn more, sooner. One reason for this accelerated learning is the intense focus on literacy, as well as new reading programs at all levels, and longer, more connected instructional periods. At the Bailey, I was told that though most students are reading, some are not ready. Often, students who haven’t had the benefit of preschool begin kindergarten behind their classmates—especially if they don’t speak English or if they come from poor or uneducated families. Those students spend half their kindergarten year learning how to adapt to a structured classroom (sitting, sharing, listening, and communicating in English)—all things they would have learned in preschool if they had been able to attend (along with the alphabet, numbers, and writing your name). Since 2003 when preschool transportation was cut,  many students most in need of early intervention are not able to attend. I fear those with the late start may never catch up.   

There are currently 3 responses to “Is kindergarten the new first grade?”

Why not let us know what you think by adding your own comment! Your opinion is as valid as anyone elses, so come on... let us know what you think.

  1. 1 On June 3rd, 2007, jimgon said:

    You’ve struck a point with the question “is Kindergarten the new first grade?” I think it is, and I think that presents a problem. There are lots of people who are more interested in giving a child a family environment pre-K rather than sending them to pre-school. Factor in that pre-schools, unless your fortunate enough to live in a community that can offer them as part of public education, are expensive. I know plenty of people who were/are faced with the prospect of one parent working simply to pay for pre-school. Personally, my experience registering my daughter for K this year was that the school psychologist looked at me like a villain when I said my daughter was home with her nana instead of going to pre-school. So, your point about kids not catching up is interesting. My counter-point is, is it a good thing that some kids are pushed out of the nest so early?

  2. 2 On June 3rd, 2007, Jackie said:

    Your perspective is important–that some parents prefer not to have their child begin school so young or that some cannot afford it.  As I wrote earlier, preschool is especially helpful for those students most at risk–particularly English Language Learners, but I also believe it is good for all kids. Because it is only 2.5 hours, four days a week, there’s still plenty of time to bond with Nana or other caregivers (also important). Still, I realize that each child is an individual and that needs to be honored by keeping preschool a voluntary option for all parents. (I’ve also seen home settings that offered excellent academics along with one-on-one nurturing.) Regarding cost: in Lowell, preschool is provided free although enrollment is limited and when necessary, determined on a lottery basis. What I don’t like is what we’ve seen happening here since we cut pre-k transportation, and that is, many children who would most benefit from this experience can’t because their parents are unable to pick-up and drop-off their children for a 2 1/2 hour school day, and that is just plain wrong. 

  3. 3 On June 3rd, 2007, Ryan said:

    It’s fascinating, isn’t it? By far, most kids learned to read when I was in first grade (and I’m only 23). I was able to read a bit in Kindergarden, but not right away and I was definately the minority.

    My little sister, on the other hand, is 13 1/2 and could read before kindergarden… so I think she’s definately a part of this generation that reads a year or two before we ever did. Granted, she’s exceptionally bright (she got better than a 1200 on the SATs at 13!), but she was definately not alone in being able to read fairly well in kindergarden.

  • Blogroll

  • Contact Us

  • Education Links

  • Local Groups

  • Local media